Industry News
Technology
Culture
Mobile
Development
Business
Startups
Politics
Education
Web
Interviews
Luganda
This website uses IntenseDebate comments, but they are not currently loaded because either your browser doesn't support JavaScript, or they didn't load fast enough.













Reaction to the NYTimes Profile on African Startups
The mainstream media often has a hard time highlighting the good going on in Africa because there’s so much perceived and actual tragedy here to draw their attention. The problem with their covering only the bad (which should always have a place in the media) is that it definitively shapes public opinion. No matter what we do as African entrepreneurs, we’ll be perceived as being at some sort of disadvantage. Subsequently, anytime you’re recognized for achieving anything, it’s often perceived as ‘looking for a handout’ even if that’s not the case.
Eventually this shapes opinions on our capabilities in general so I’m grateful for reporters like Dwyer Gunn who go out of their way to shine some light on the people who spend their days trying to change the reality of Africa as much as the perceptions about it. If nothing else, it offers another side to the story that everyone in the world knows all too well.
Recently Appfrica Labs, some of our own entrepreneurs and two other African startups were profiled on the Freakonomics Blog of the New York Times. Here are a few reactions to the article that Dwyer wrote.
One commenter writes:
I agree. Corruption is the hardest problem to solve anywhere yet it’s incredibly stunting to growth wherever it exists. Another writes:
Absolutely, this is another problem, the lack of stability and trust in authority (to police and protect). Another reader completely confuses me with this:
No matter what you put in front of some people, they often can’t get past their own notions of what’s actually going on. To one we’re the underdogs. To another it’s inevitable. The commenter above, in particular, seems to write his reactions based on some preconceived notions of what one would expect to find occurring in Africa. Maybe it was the presentation or the lack of depth on each company (in what was intended to be a short blog post). Fair enough, this post attempts to address four of his apparent preconceptions…
Preconception #1: Surely, the black guy in an article about African entrepreneurs must be African.
Actually, I’m not African and I don’t fault anyone for making this mistake as there’s no way you could know without doing some research. Just to clarify, I’m 100% red-blodded American. I don’t even like the term African-American, as it means nothing to Africans. (Africa isn’t a country and there are people of all races who live and were born here. It’s like calling an Indian person Asian-American. Partly true, but how does that help classify anyone? I digress.) You’d have to go back more than four generations to connect my family to Africa and even then, you wouldn’t find any relation to Uganda. In some ways I’m just like every well-meaning colonialist, aid worker or expatriate who ever came before me. In some ways I’m not. What I am actually is American-Ugandan. =)
In my case, I have a passion for Africa because I see a lot of opportunity and a lot of unrecognized potential. Recognizing this is as important as recognizing the other two entrepreneurs in the article are indeed Ugandan and Senegalese. Why? Because the African diaspora (with it’s various ethnic groups and races) is working to help itself and it helps us all to recognize why and to support it.
Preconception #2: These African companies are dependent upon the west.
In some ways he’s right. I’m an American investing in African startups, Magatte is indeed French educated, and Ketty does indeed rely upon the Aid/AIDS industry. But here’s another perspective. All of us have started ventures that 1) bring wealth and resources to the region 2) that provide an example for other local entrepreneurs and 3) are in most cases self-sustaining. If we were to look beyond the companies in this article, we’d find a number of examples of local companies only doing business locally. That’s great, but is it really the only way to grow a business? Just like every other country in the world, African countries need to increase trade internationally in order to grow. Doing that does not preclude pan-African trade, in my opinion it absolutely requires it.
It’s basic economics. The ‘first world nations’ of the world have ‘all the money’, Entrepreneurs like us are simply trying to find ways to proactively engage the West so as to build wealth in our respective regions. How is that not un-similar to how China and India have reshaped their societies over the past fifty years? To even think about it “the West” is a misnomer. We live in a global economy where a quarter of the planet has three quarters of all the world’s capital. The startups profiled here are simply trying to engage the world with trade versus aid. Aid = absolute dependancy. Trade = not necessarily.
In fact, Is there even an economy left anywhere on the planet that isn’t dependent on either trade or aid? I think this global meltdown is evidence that such a place doesn’t exist anymore, unless you are indeed looking at ‘the bottom’ economies of the world.
Preconception #3: Surely, nothing I’m thinking of has been tried before in Africa…at least not correctly.
This person makes the statement that people need to simply invest in Africa like they would anywhere else on the planet. I’m not sure if he gets the definition of the term ‘venture capitalist’ as it’s exactly that…investing in startup businesses based on their need. It’s the sole reason I created my company, to help African startups access capital that doesn’t really exist here due to a number of factors. Of course, there are complexities to the market and other models for investment, I’ve chosen to invest in startup entrepreneurs, others invest differently. Appfrica doesn’t rely on external funding, we simply have to earn what we spend. We don’t earn, our business fails…just like every other for-profit business on the planet.
Likewise, I don’t see how the other two companies are dependent on the West in anyway. Is an American educated at Oxford dependent on the British?
Preconception #4: Remittances are a bad thing.
How? This is a trend of the entire planet. A small town American girl moves away to go to college in the big city, if her parents are having a hard time, she sends money back home. An Indian tech enthusiast moves to Silicon Valley to work for a startup and makes a lot of money when it goes public or sells, if his parents are having a hard time, he sends money back home. It’s no different in Africa. Family takes care of family. It also assumes that just because these families are helping each other across oceans, that the only thing the receiver is doing is sitting around waiting for more money.
Now, I don’t mean to make an example out of this commenter, I realize that there was limited information offered in the article. His comments just represent the thoughts of millions of people around the world when it comes to Africa so I wanted to offer my own opinions. It’s all valuable insight and he does indeed offer an interesting perspective.
Whether you agree with my points or disagree with them drop a comment on the Freakonomics thread here.
Photo: Ketty Opoka, courtesy of the NewYorkTimes.