Industry News
Technology
Culture
Mobile
Development
Business
Startups
Politics
Education
Web
Interviews
Luganda
This website uses IntenseDebate comments, but they are not currently loaded because either your browser doesn't support JavaScript, or they didn't load fast enough.













Web 2.0 Services Shutting Out Developing Countries
In a particularly infuriating Article, the NewYorkTimes sites developing countries as the toughest places to monetize web traffic for web services like YouTube, Facebook and MySpace. The article makes the argument that countries in South America, parts of Asia and Africa, are particularly hard to monetize due to the increased costs of serving rich media (like video and flash advertisements) to low bandwidth regions of the world. There’s also the factor of Advertising to low-income (by comparison) foreign markets who, even if they were interested in the products being pushed to them, probably couldn’t by them due to lack of expendable income.
The article never goes on to make the very valid, and totally logical observation that these companies simply don’t know how to monetize these markets because they don’t understand the complexities involved. Bandwidth is probably the least of hurdles to overcome, the bigger issue is to understand who the major companies of the market are, how they reach consumers and to determine if they can reach their consumers through the web. If not then, yes, they probably aren’t right for the market and if they exit then it creates a huge opportunity for local entrepreneurs to innovate. Especially when services like MySpace are considering offering scaled back or ‘light’ offerings for developing countries. For instance, the absence of Hulu in Africa offers a huge opportunity to broker deals to offer content via the web here in it’s stead, if that were your motive (you’ll have to ask Jason Elk how that’s working out for him =).
Ben White of ict4entrepreneurship.com writes in his article “YouTube ‘burden’ creates opportunity in Africa“…
This is good for two reasons. Why should the Twitter’s and Facebook’s of the world dominate the whole planet? At the end of the day, their American companies that innovate for similar markets. Meanwhile services like MXit and Zoopy are innovating for countries that fall under the radar of most web services. They’ve found a way to succeed where their first world counterparts either can’t or don’t care to. This isn’t a disadvantage, it’s a huge ADVANTAGE if you look at the opportunity to tap a completely untapped market and monetize people who are often marked as a blue variable on someones spreadsheet.
Read the full NYT Article here.